Marshall Bluesbreaker 1962 Reviews
- RBR. B.Verified BuyerRated 3 out of 5 stars5 months agoTest the demo before buying...
This is the first UAD plugin that I'm actually not happy with. I bought it for a killer price but took nearly 30 minutes til I got a tone I thought was worth using. Even then I wasn't happy. It sounded dusty, dark and muddy. By no means is it a 1 star sound but definately not a 5 star sound. I think if you're looking to get this, download a demo before buying, I sure wish I did.
Was this helpful? - SSS. S.Verified BuyerI do not recommend this productRated 1 out of 5 stars6 months agoThis amplifier sounds terrible
If you want to play with gain through this amp, you’ll be disappointed. On the third string, you’ll get an unwanted overtone, like an inaccurate octave pedal. Listen closely, and you’ll hear that unpleasant resonance. I do not recommend buying this plugin. It sounds awful.
Was this helpful? - ACA. C.I recommend this productRated 5 out of 5 stars9 months agoClapton is god
See above
Was this helpful? - DBD. B.I do not recommend this productRated 1 out of 5 stars1 year agoSounds nothing like the UA demo
This plugin is not fit for purpose. As A. Siegler commented, "What you hear on the UA site and what you actually get are two different things." The tonal balance is so bottom-heavy that even with extreme EQ adjustment it is unusable. There is not one single preset that sounds like a decent DI, let alone the mic'd presets which sound like they were recorded in a tunnel. I will gladly uninstall/deactivate this plugin in exchange for a refund, but I'm not holding my breath. Until UA offers a 14-day trial on all of its products I will not be buying any more Apollo/Unison amp sims.
Was this helpful? - COC. O.I recommend this productRated 5 out of 5 stars1 year agoBreaking Blue
This has been great for tracking quick demos with a lot of flava. The sound manipulation with the different mics is excellent. Lot of different tones available here. Worth it, for sure.
Was this helpful?